Bunselpower Project Manager
Posts : 2974
| Subject: [Discussion] Bounsweet Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:51 pm | |
| Proposed SetsSet 1 : Tsareena WilliamsAbility: Queenly Majesty Nature: Impish Item: Gold Bottle Cap IV spread: 31/31/31/x/31/31 Hidden Power: None Egg Moves: -Feint -Synthesis -Play Rough -Charm Set 1 : Tsareena GomezAbility: Queenly Majesty Nature: Jolly Item: Gold Bottle Cap IV spread: 31/31/31/x/31/31 Hidden Power: None Egg Moves: -Feint -Synthesis -Play Rough -Charm I actually think only the Impish is necessary. The Jolly fills a niche, but it's a rather small Bisharp killing niche with the possibility of a Choice Scarf. Since it's a spinner with instant recovery and U-Turn, it's going to probably play a defensive role and I think Impish fits the best. Plus, it's only a nature change, which isn't a huge deal. But it makes me no difference, I have both, just trying to limit what our cloners have to do.
Last edited by Bunselpower on Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:47 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
bash678 Breeder
Posts : 926
| Subject: Re: [Discussion] Bounsweet Sun Mar 26, 2017 5:18 pm | |
| I think you probably meant Sweet Veil on the first set and Queenly majesty on the second?
Oh by the way, I need to return your sandygast. thanks! | |
|
Mademoiselle C Goddess
Posts : 2868
| Subject: Re: [Discussion] Bounsweet Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:42 am | |
| Obvious Togedemaru copy paste is obvious.
I don't see Splash in the list of egg moves on Serebii? In any case, I really like Feint in doubles, so maybe add that as an egg move. | |
|
Bunselpower Project Manager
Posts : 2974
| Subject: Re: [Discussion] Bounsweet Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:52 pm | |
| - Mademoiselle C wrote:
- Obvious Togedemaru copy paste is obvious.
I don't see Splash in the list of egg moves on Serebii? In any case, I really like Feint in doubles, so maybe add that as an egg move. Huh, it isn't an egg move. I had it on my set and assumed those were the 4 it got. so mine apparently only know 3. I'll add Feint. And for ability this is why I was suggesting just one set. I think Queenly majesty greatly outshines Sweet Veil, since there's no more Dark Void. If it's just a nature change I'd rather just send one. | |
|
Mademoiselle C Goddess
Posts : 2868
| Subject: Re: [Discussion] Bounsweet Tue Mar 28, 2017 1:10 pm | |
| Impish kinda seems like a waste of that 120 attack stat though. I would probably use an adamant or jolly set but idk... honestly I most likely won't use it at all. | |
|
Bunselpower Project Manager
Posts : 2974
| Subject: Re: [Discussion] Bounsweet Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:42 pm | |
| It does, but at the same time, it has 98 defenses. I'm not averse to doing both Adamant and Impish. Or just Adamant and letting everyone get their own Impish. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: [Discussion] Bounsweet | |
| |
|